This page contains affiliate links. Learn more.

Our Verdict (Best For)
The Epic Pure is our #1 pitcher pick for usability but only showed adequate contaminant reduction in our lab tests. Also, trace amounts of methylene chloride (2024/2025) and increased strontium (2024) – all below health guidelines – suggest potential leaching. The filtered water tasted clean, though not 100% perfect, and was odor-free. Despite no NSF/ANSI certifications for contaminant reduction, it has comprehensive third-party testing to its full filter life. Pitcher setup is easy, it filters fast enough for daily use, pours smoothly, and fits easily in the fridge. The BPA/BPS-free Tritan build feels sturdy, we like the wood handle, and the large feed/filtered water capacities mean fewer refills. More pros: Below-average long-term cost, lifetime warranty + satisfaction guarantee, and filter recycling program.
The Epic Pure pitcher is a drinking water filter that can purify both tap water and properly disinfected well water.
As usual, we’ve tested the pitcher with our own hands:
- Hands-on experience: We assembled, primed, used, and maintained it.
- Filtration effectiveness: Across 2 independent test rounds, we sent unfiltered and filtered tap water samples to professional laboratories for analysis to determine real-world contaminant reduction. Each round used a different pitcher, water supply, and lab. We also reviewed NSF/ANSI certifications and other available test data.
- More testing: We conducted taste and odor evaluations as well as filtration speed tests.
- All other product aspects: We considered initial and long-term costs, warranties, additional features, frequent customer complaints, and more.
To learn more about our testing procedure check our editorial guidelines.
Contents
Final Rating: /5.00
FiltrationFiltration score combines our lab results and taste testing with NSF/ANSI certifications and 3rd-party contaminant reduction data.: /5.00
Usability: /5.00
CostsCost scores reflect overall value for money rather than price alone.: /5.00
| Type: | Water Filter Pitcher |
| PriceNo short-term sales. (Sep 16, 2025): | $79 (Use Code BOSEpic for 20% Off or Save 15% With Filter Subscription) |
| Yearly CostEstimate is based on rated/claimed filter life and 300 gallons annual water consumption. No short-term sales. (Sep 16, 2025): | ~$106 (Save 15% With Filter Subscription) |
(Use Code BOSEpic for 20% Off!)
Final Rating: /5.00
What We Like Most
- Filtered water had a little taste left and no odor (2024). Filtered water had a much better taste and no odor (2025).
- Pretty much fully covered by third-party testing for contaminant reduction to 100% filter Life.
- Modern, sturdy design made from BPA- and BPS-free medical-grade Tritan plastic.
- Setup is straightforward (written instructions are long-winded but there are illustrations for each step + video).
- Filters fast enough for daily use (clear reservoir allows you to monitor).
- Large feed and filtered capacity (still fits the fridge) means fewer refills required and you can fill a 40-oz bottle with 1 refill.
- Wood handle provides for a very comfortable grip. Pours smoothly even when pouring fast.
- Flip-top opens easily by pressing the rubber tab near the handle.
- Easy to maintain with a long 150-gallon filter life; replacements are simple, tracked by a built-in 90-day indicator.
- Slightly below average annual filter replacement cost (upfront price is about average).
- Lifetime warranty and satisfaction guarantee.
- Recycling program offers 1 free filter for every 5 recycled.
What We Don’t Like
- Considerable amount of methylene chloride detected in filtered water in our 2025 lab testing (still below strictest health guidelines).
- Higher level of strontium detected in filtered water in our 2024 lab testing (still below strictest health guidelines).
- No actual NSF/ANSI certifications for contaminant reduction.
- On-demand filtering takes patience.
- Third-party customer complaints include cracked plastic, lid/flap problems, water leakage and spillage when pouring and slow filtration rate.
How the Epic Pure Compares to…
13 Other Water Filter Pitchers
In this video, Sara explains why the Epic Pure became our #1 pitcher for usability.
Please note: Our full guide on the best water filter pitchers is available here.
Video Chapters + Comparison Sheet
- Link to Comparison Sheet
- 00:00 – Intro
- 00:33 – What’s New
- 01:10 – Our 14 Pitchers
- 03:00 – Top Pick: Clearly Filtered
- 12:21 – Runner-Up: Culligan (and ZeroWater)
- 23:20 – For Usability: Epic Pure
- 26:22 – Budget Pick: Brita Everyday Elite
- 28:07 – Hard Water: Waterdrop Chubby
- 28:57 – Bacteria & Parasites: LifeStraw
- 30:16 – Seychelle RAD & Aquagear
- 32:03 – LARQ Pitcher PureVis
- 33:35 – PUR Plus 11-Cup
- 35:09 – Summary
Full Analysis of the Epic Pure
Filtration: /5.00
The Epic Pure water filter pitcher scored 3.73/5.00 for filtration. How? Most importantly, it achieved adequate results in both our 2024 and 2025 lab testing. In our 2025 test, the filtered water had a much improved taste compared to our tap water (though it was not perfect), while we noted a little remaining taste in the 2024 test (no odor was noted either year). Finally, while the pitcher has no NSF/ANSI certifications for contaminant reduction, it is pretty much fully covered by third-party testing to 100% filter life.
1. Lab Results: /5.00 (2025) & /5.00 (2024)
Remember that our before vs after lab comparison is not an exact science. It’s informational and subject to variability, inaccuracies, and interferences caused by natural fluctuations in water quality, accidental contamination, human error, instrumentation issues, and more. Furthermore, our lab-testing is limited to those contaminants present in our water supplies and at their respective concentrations. As such, it can only give us a general idea for how effective a certain water treatment product might be.
In our 2024 and 2025 lab tests comparing an unfiltered and a filtered tap water sample, the Epic Pure pitcher could remove 9 undesirable impurities and contaminants to below the minimum detection level (so essentially to 100%): chlorine, bromodichloromethane*, bromoform, dibromochloromethane*, chloroform*, copper, iron, nitrate, and uranium.
The following substances remained in our water:
- Barium wasn’t reduced at all in 2024. Although this seems like a particularly bad result at first glance, barium was already at the lowest detectable level (0.01 ppm) in the unfiltered water sample. Due to a limitation of that year’s testing method (the lab reported barium only in 0.01 ppm increments), reduction could only be calculated as either 0% or 100%. That said, the very low 6% reduction in 2025 further suggests that the Epic Pure is not effective at removing barium. This seems to contradict the pitcher’s third-party test data which claims the reduction of barium by 92.70%. This apparent discrepancy may be explained by differing test conditions: Epic evaluated barium removal from feed water spiked to ~1 ppm, whereas our feed water contained a 25x-100x lower concentration. (The same may also apply to other contaminants for which our observed reduction rates differ materially from those reported by the manufacturer, including cases of potential leaching.)
- Boron was reduced by a solid 75% in 2024. In 2025, it was completely removed.
- Lithium increased by 100% in 2024 (not present in 2025). Like barium, lithium was detected near the analytical detection limit (0.01 ppm) in 2024, so this percentage change reflects a minimal absolute difference and could also represent natural fluctuations. Anyway, we don’t expect the Epic Pure filter to add lithium to the water but it may not reduce it, either.
- Strontium increased by 72% in 2024 and by 33% in 2025. Both years, strontium was present in the feed water at a concentration well above the lowest limits of detection, so these large increases are not likely due to natural variability. This suggests the Epic Pure is not effective at removing strontium and may even cause potential leaching. Fortunately, in both lab tests strontium was well below the strictest health guideline (1.5 ppm).
- Manganese increased by 144% in 2025 (it wasn’t present in 2024). This could represent natural fluctuations as it occurred at a fairly low concentration in our feed water, but it could also suggest potential leaching. However, while excessive exposure may pose risks to sensitive populations – the California OEHHA has set a very conservative notification level of 0.02 ppm for drinking water based primarily on limited animal data and the application of large safety/uncertainty factors to protect bottle-fed infants – manganese is an essential dietary element for humans and the measured level (0.0088 ppm) remains below the notification threshold. As with barium, a 144% increase in manganese contradicts the Epic Pure’s test data which reports 99.10% reduction.
- Fluoride decreased by a moderate 59% in 2024. However, we used a different and presumably more accurate fluoride detection method in 2025, and fluoride was completely eliminated. This later result is consistent with Epic’s reported reduction rate of 97.88%.
Finally, limescale/hardness increased by 17% in 2024 and by 7% in 2025. These increases might actually be the pitcher releasing ions from its ion exchange resin and should subside quickly. That said, it still might not be suited for protecting your kettle and/or coffee maker from buildup.
Aside from contaminant reduction, we found 2 substances in our 2024 filtered water that were not present in the unfiltered water, suggesting potential leaching: aluminum (0.08 ppm) and methylene chloride (0.71 ppb). Although far from ideal, aluminum was present below the public health goal of 0.6 ppm per the OEHHA. In 2025, methylene chloride reappeared in the filtered water and at a higher level (1.63 ppb) than the previous year which we find more concerning. Though even in the 2025 test, methylene chloride was still almost 2.5x lower than the strictest public health guideline of 4 ppb per the OEHHA. The detection of aluminum and methylene chloride in the filtered water also contradicts Epic’s third-party test data which reports 76.70% and >97.30% reduction, respectively, and may be subject to the same test-condition and leaching considerations discussed above.
*In our 2025 lab testing, we artificially spiked our tap water with fluoride and nitrate because our new water supply contains neither. The nitrate solution, however, unintentionally contained chloroform, resulting in a test concentration of 1,670 ppm – far above realistic tap water levels (100 ppm is already considered high). Despite this extremely elevated concentration, the Epic Pure removed all chloroform and other disinfection byproducts. This result is noteworthy on its own and is also why we did not re-test VOC reduction, unlike other pitchers that failed to fully remove VOCs (including chloroform) in our ultra-high chloroform test.
Lab Results Charts
| Potentially Harmful | Aesthetic Issues | Feed Water Level | Filtered Water Level | Reduction Rate | |
| Water Disinfectants | |||||
| Chlorine (mg/L) | ✖ | ✖ | ~2 | 0 | 100% |
| Disinfection Byproducts (Ultra-High Chloroform) | |||||
| Bromodichloromethane (µg/L) | ✖ | 19.9 | 0 | 100% | |
| Dibromochloromethane (µg/L) | ✖ | 5.81 | 0 | 100% | |
| Chloroform (µg/L) | ✖ | 1,670 | 0.87 | 100% | |
| Metals | |||||
| Copper (mg/L) | ✖ | ✖ | 0.0136 | 0 | 100% |
| Iron (mg/L) | ✖ | 0.0763 | 0 | 100% | |
| Manganese (mg/L) | ✖ | ✖ | 0.0036 | 0.0088 | 144% Increase |
| Barium (mg/L) | ✖ | 0.0407 | 0.0383 | 6% | |
| Boron (mg/L) | ✖ | 0.0153 | 0 | 100% | |
| Strontium (mg/L) | ✖ | 0.112 | 0.149 | 33% Increase | |
| Salts | |||||
| Nitrate (N) (mg/L) | ✖ | 2.74 | 0 | 100% | |
| Fluoride (mg/L) | ✖ | 0.925 | 0 | 100% | |
| Aesthetic Parameters | |||||
| Hardness (mg/L) | ✖ | 59.89 | 63.92 | 7% Increase | |
| Other Parameters | |||||
| pH | 7.8 | 7.3 | |||
| Impurities NOT Detected in Unfiltered Tap Water Sample | |||||
| Methylene Chloride (µg/L) | ✖ | 0 | 1.63 | ||
| Lab Reports (Ultra-High Chloroform): Filtered Water Report, Unfiltered Water Report | |||||
| Chlorine Self Test Photos: Filtered Water, Unfiltered Water | |||||
| Explanation: | |||||
| Full Removal | |||||
| Considerable Reduction | |||||
| Concentration More Than Double of Unfiltered Water Sample | |||||
| Potential Leaching Reached or Exceeded the Strictest Public Health Guideline We Could Find | |||||
| Potentially Harmful | Aesthetic Issues | Feed Water Level | Filtered Water Level | Reduction Rate | |
| Water Disinfectants | |||||
| Chlorine (mg/L) | ✖ | ✖ | 0.2 | 0 | 100% |
| Disinfection Byproducts | |||||
| Bromodichloromethane (µg/L) | ✖ | 0.58 | 0 | 100% | |
| Bromoform (µg/L) | ✖ | 0.75 | 0 | 100% | |
| Dibromochloromethane (µg/L) | ✖ | 0.94 | 0 | 100% | |
| Metals | |||||
| Copper (mg/L) | ✖ | ✖ | 0.01 | 0 | 100% |
| Barium (mg/L) | ✖ | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0% | |
| Boron (mg/L) | ✖ | 0.04 | 0.01 | 75% | |
| Lithium (mg/L) | ✖ | 0.01 | 0.02 | 100% Increase | |
| Strontium (mg/L) | ✖ | 0.18 | 0.31 | 72% Increase | |
| Salts | |||||
| Nitrate (N) (mg/L) | ✖ | 1.65 | 0 | 100% | |
| Fluoride (mg/L) (Flawed?) | ✖ | 0.46 | 0.19 | 59% | |
| Other | |||||
| Uranium (µg/L) | ✖ | 7 | 0 | 100% | |
| Aesthetic Parameters | |||||
| Hardness (mg/L) | ✖ | 111.9 | 130.4 | 17% Increase | |
| Other Parameters | |||||
| Alkalinity (mg/L) | 140 | 130 | 7% | ||
| pH | 7.77 | 7.81 | |||
| Impurities NOT Detected in Unfiltered Tap Water Sample | |||||
| Aluminum (mg/L) | ✖ | ✖ | 0 | 0.08 | |
| Methylene Chloride (µg/L) | ✖ | 0 | 0.71 | ||
| Lab Reports: Filtered Water Report, Unfiltered Water Report | |||||
| Explanation: | |||||
| Full Removal | |||||
| Considerable Reduction | |||||
| Concentration More Than Double of Unfiltered Water Sample | |||||
| Potential Leaching Reached or Exceeded the Strictest Public Health Guideline We Could Find | |||||
2. NSF/ANSI Certifications and Other Test Data
The Epic Pure pitcher has no NSF/ANSI certifications for contaminant reduction. However, it is pretty much fully covered by extensive third-party testing to 100% filter life against NSF/ANSI standards 42, 53, 401, and other non-NSF/ANSI standards. This testing covers 212 different impurities, including many organics and several heavy metals. Reported reduction rates include VOCs (92.60-99.70%+), semi-volatiles (87.00-99.80%+), pesticides (99.00-99.90%+), herbicides (98.90-99.90%+), trace pharmaceuticals and other emerging contaminants (90.00-99.20%+), microplastics (99.62%), a bunch of radiological elements (>99.73%), PFOA (>99.60%), PFOS (>99.80%), lead (99.94%), mercury (91.80%), chromium 6 (99.20%), arsenic (94.00%), beryllium (98.00%), and aluminum (76.70%).
3. Filtration Process
The Epic Pure filter cartridge features an activated carbon block and an ion exchange resin. In addition to adsorption, the activated carbon block provides fine mechanical filtration due to its smaller pore size compared to granular carbon, enabling it to reduce chlorine and chloramine, improve taste and odor, and remove disinfection byproducts, other organic compounds, certain metals, and fine particulate matter. The ion exchange resin targets dissolved, unwanted ions in the water.
4. Taste and Odor Tests
In our 2024 test, the filtered water was odorless but had a little remaining taste. In our 2025 test, the filtered water was odorless as well, and the taste was much improved compared to our tap water (though it was not perfect).

Usability: /5.00
The Epic Pure pitcher achieved a usability score of 4.60/5.00, based on its performance in the following categories:
- Initial system assembly including filter priming (0.80/1.00)
- Day-to-day use (3.10/3.10)
- Filter replacements (0.70/0.90)
1. Initial Setup: /1.00
Assembling the Epic Pure pitcher is easy. In addition to the provided user booklet including clear illustrations, there is a tutorial video on YouTube for the visual learners. However, some might find the booklet’s written instructions to be a bit annoying, as the long-winded, cutesy phrasing makes it harder to figure out each step.
Here’s a quick overview of the setup process:
- Check to ensure the filter’s clear silicone gasket is in place to prevent any leaks.
- Hand wash the pitcher and its components with a mild detergent and rinse well. Note: Keep the filter itself away from soap and hot water. Do not soak lid underwater, as the digital timer is water resistant, not waterproof.
- Screw filter back onto your reservoir – no need to match up reservoir holes with the filter holes.
- Make sure the lid fits securely on the pitcher (sometimes the top reservoir gets turned around when you take it out). The flat side of the reservoir goes towards the direction of the spout. It should fit on snugly.
- Flush your filter by filling the reservoir with cold tap water. Discard the first two jugs of filtered water to remove any loose carbon fines (or use on house plants).
- Hit start on your digital timer to begin the 90-day countdown.


2. Day-to-Day Use: /3.10
2.1 Speed & Water Capacity: /1.20
The Epic Pure pitcher is an excellent choice for daily use. Firstly, its reservoirs are large and well-balanced (8-cup feed, 11-cup filtered capacity), so it can store plenty of water and requires fewer daily refills to meet your needs – we estimate 4 refills for the average-sized US and US family households. This means you will not have to make frequent trips to the tap, unlike with pitcher models that have smaller feed (or feed + filtered) reservoirs, which will need to be topped off repeatedly.
In addition, the Epic Pure filters fast enough to meet the daily water needs of the average-sized US (family) household, and it can handle thirst bursts. That said, on-demand filtering still takes some patience. In our 2025 filtration speed test, the pitcher could filter 4 cups in 8:41 min. In 2024, it took slightly longer at 9:30 min.
Finally, the pitcher fits both on the shelves and in the door of a standard fridge (dimensions: 5.4″x10.8″x10.75″), and thanks to the ample feed and filtered capacities, you can fill a large 40-oz bottle with a single refill.


2.2 Handling & Pouring: /1.15
The Epic Pure’s attractive round wood handle provides a very comfortable grip and allows for smooth pouring without spills, even when pouring quickly.
Its weight including the wet filter cartridge is average compared to the other pitchers we have tested, coming in at 2 lb 4.2 oz. While heavier weight may indicate sturdier construction (e.g., thicker plastic) and/or more filter media (desirable for better filtration results), it also can make handling more of a challenge.

2.3 Refilling: /0.75
The Epic Pure is easy to refill with one hand thanks to its flip-top lid that opens by pressing the blue rubber tab near the top of the handle. The clear upper reservoir allows you to see how much water remains to be filtered.

3. Filter Replacements: /0.90
Filter replacements are very easy, and this pitcher comes with a 90-day timer built into the lid to remind you when to do so. Rated filter life is 150 gallons. Assuming 300 gallons of yearly water consumption for the average household, we estimate that you will only have to change the filter 2x annually. Note: per the manufacturer, the timer is set for 90 days just as a reminder. Depending on use and water quality, the filter may last longer or shorter than 90 days. If the filter is still working after 6 months, they recommend changing it to ensure maximum filtration.

Support BOS Water’s Mission!
Every coffee helps us test more products and bring you unbiased results!
Costs: /5.00
Based on value for money, the Epic Pure pitcher achieved a cost score of 4.73 out of 5.00, indicating it is relatively inexpensive for what it offers compared to competing pitchers (a score of 4.00 represents average value). Notably, its upfront price is around average and annual filter replacement cost is slightly below average compared to the other pitchers we tested.
1. Upfront Price
As of September 16, 2025, the Epic Pure is priced at $79. Applying our 20% off discount code reduces the upfront cost to $63.20, which is similar to the $58.53 average across all the water filter pitchers we tested. Alternatively, choosing a filter subscription would provide you 15% off.
2. Long-Term Expenses for Filter Replacements
Based on 300 gallons consumption and a 150-gallon filter life, we estimate $106 in annual filter replacement costs, which is slightly below the $120.13 average across all the water filter pitchers we tested. That said, you can save 15% with a filter subscription.
3. Product Warranty
The system is covered by a lifetime warranty and satisfaction guarantee.
4. Other Cost Factors
- The pitcher is made from medical-grade Tritan, which, according to Epic, is free from BPA & BPS.
- The pitcher feels sturdy and well-built.
- The recycling program provides 1 free filter in exchange for 5 used ones.
Additional
1. Looks
The wooden handle and blue rubber tab create a stylish, modern appearance.
2. Environmentally Friendly Packaging
We like that all of the packaging appeared to be eco-friendly – per the manufacturer, it is 100% compostable.
3. Frequent Customer Complaints
We read about issues with cracked plastic, lid/flap problems, water leaking/spilling when pouring, and slow filtration.
While we agree that filtration is on the slower side for this pitcher, we actually found the overall handling experience to be very positive: the lid is easy to open one handed thanks to the blue tab, it pours smoothly and seems solidly built.
Bottom Line: Our #1 Pitcher for Usability (/5.00)
Filtration weighted at 60%, and usability and cost at 20% each, the Epic Pure pitcher scored a final rating of 4.10 out of 5.00.
If day-to-day usability is your focus, the Epic Pure is our top pick amongst the tested water filter pitchers. It’s a cinch to set up, use and maintain; its large feed/filtered volumes allow you to store plenty of water with fewer refills (easily done one-handed), and its long, 150-gallon rated filter life means filter replacements will be infrequent (though they, too, are simple). It pours well and looks good while doing it, with its attractive wooden handle giving it a modern flair.
However, its filtration performance fell short; it showed incomplete removal and even potential leaching of a few contaminants in our lab tests, occasionally contradicting the extensive 3rd-party testing data provided by the manufacturer (no NSF/ANSI certifications). That said, it’s a budget-friendly option, as upfront cost is about average and annual filter replacement costs come in slightly below average; other incentive programs like filter recycling further stretch your dollar.
(Use Code BOSEpic for 20% Off!)
Further Reading
