Review: Purewell Gravity Water Filter System

This page contains affiliate links. If you buy a product or service through such a link, we earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Authors: Sara and Raoul | Last Updated: 2025/08/11

Purewell on Sara's Countertop

Our Verdict (Best for)

The Purewell is our top budget pick among the home gravity water filters we’ve tested. In this category, the Purewell didn’t perform as well overall as the Big Berkey, but the system is much more affordable. Also, if nitrate removal is your #1 priority, the Purewell did much better than the Big Berkey in our lab testing. Finally, there are restocking issues with the Big Berkey filters, so from that perspective the Purewell might be the better choice right now.

The Purewell is a gravity (countertop) water filter that doesn’t require a plumbing connection. It’s designed for use as a drinking water filter and can purify both tap water and properly disinfected well water (for water sources of unknown quality we recommend boiling or disinfection as a first defense.)

As usual, we’ve tested the system with our own hands:

  1. Hands-on experience: We installed/assembled, used, and maintained it.
  2. Filtration effectiveness: We sent an unfiltered and a filtered tap water sample to a professional lab for analysis in order to determine real-life contaminant reduction capabilities. Plus, we checked for NSF certifications and other test data.
  3. More testing: We performed a taste & odor test and a filtration speed test.
  4. All other product aspects: We considered initial + long-term cost, product warranties, additional features, frequent customer complaints, etc.
Purewell

Overall Rating: 3.83/5.00

Filtration: 3.41/5.00

Usability: 4.00/5.00

Costs: 4.94/5.00

Type: Gravity Filter
Price (Jan 20, 2025, w/o Short-Term Sales): $159
What’s Included? 2x Black Filters, Tank Stand, No Fluoride Filters
Estimated Yearly Cost (Aug 28, 2024): ~$140 (Using 2x Black Filters in Parallel)

WxHxD: 8.8″x20″x8.8″
Weight (With 2x Black Filters Installed): 9 lbs
Max # of Filter Elements: 2
Clean Water Tank: 2.25 gal
Other Available Sizes: 1.0 gal, 1.5 gal, 2.9 gal
Filter Media/Process (Black Filters): Silver-Infused Activated Carbon Block With 0.01-Micron Hollow Fiber Ultrafiltration Membrane Core (3,000 gal or 6 Months)
Filter Media/Process (Fluoride Filters): Activated Alumina, PP Cotton, Activated Carbon (500 gal or 8-12 Months)
NSF/ANSI + Other Testing for Filtration Effectiveness (# of Impurities Tested): Other Standards (6) – Performance Data Sheets
Filter Change Indicator? No
Product Warranty: ?
Manual: Not Available Online

Overall Rating: 3.83/5.00

What We Like Most

  • Highly affordable.
  • Filtered water smelled and tasted 100% clean.
  • Easy to set up, use (also thanks to tank stand and water level window), and maintain.
  • Fast filtration for a gravity-type filter and you can store enough water for later use.
  • All-metal spigot and handle.

What We Don’t Like

  • No NSF certifications and only very limited testing for actual contaminant reduction.
  • Not tested for its claimed 3,000-gallon filter lifespan.
  • Aluminum may have leached from the optional fluoride filters.
  • Vague return policy of only 30 days, “with reasonable reason”.
  • Company website doesn’t convey a lot of trust.
  • 3rd-party customers complained about taste issues, clogged filters, and leaking.

How the Purewell Compares to…

25 Other Countertop Water Filters

In this video, Sara explains why the Purewell became our #1 budget pick for a gravity-type countertop water filter.

Please note: Our full guide on the best countertop water filters is available here.

Video Chapters + Comparison Sheet

  • Link to Comparison Sheet
  • 00:00 – Intro
  • 00:33 – Our 26 Countertop Filters
  • 03:14 – How We Tested & Rated
  • 09:11 – Best Overall (AquaTru Classic)
  • 14:33 – Best RO Budget Pick (AquaTru Carafe)
  • 16:50 – Honorable Mention (Bluevua RO100ROPOT)
  • 18:27 – Best “Regular” Filters (Aquasana CWM & ZeroWater)
  • 27:47 – Best “Regular” Budget Pick (Waterdrop ED04)
  • 33:04 – Summary

6 Other Gravity Water Filters

In this video, Sara explains why the Purewell became our #1 budget pick and top recommendation for nitrate removal among the 7 gravity water filters we’ve tested.

Please note: Our full guide on the best gravity water filters is available here.

Video Chapters + Comparison Sheet

  • Link to Comparison Sheet
  • 00:00 – Intro
  • 00:27 – Our 7 Gravity Filters
  • 01:42 – How We Tested & Rated
  • 04:38 – Video Sponsor
  • 05:46 – Best Overall (Big Berkey)
  • 07:23 – Aluminum Leaching
  • 11:17 – Big Berkey Features & Pros
  • 13:20 – Big Berkey Cons
  • 13:50 – Filter Life
  • 16:25 – 3 Common Berkey Concerns
  • 19:01 – Berkey Summary
  • 19:19 – Best for Nitrate (Purewell)
  • 20:51 – Outdoor Use
  • 22:04 – Outro

Full Analysis of the Purewell

Please note: We tested the Purewell using 2 Black Filter elements in combination with 2 optional fluoride filters.

Filtration: 3.41/5.00

The Purewell scored a decent 3.41/5.00 on filtration, which is not bad considering its price point. In our lab tests, we found most contaminants were removed to 100%, but a few weren’t reduced much, and fluoride even increased considerably, which may be due to natural variations. Taste and odor of the filtered water were flawless. However, it’s also worth mentioning that the Purewell has no NSF certifications for actual contaminant reduction and only very limited third-party testing.

1. Lab Results: 4.41/5.00

exclamation icon

Remember that our before vs after lab comparison is not an exact science. It’s informational and subject to variability, inaccuracies, and interferences caused by natural fluctuations in water quality, accidental contamination, human error, instrumentation issues, and more. Furthermore, our lab-testing is limited to those contaminants present in our water supplies and at their respective concentrations. As such, it can only give us a general idea for how effective a certain water treatment product might be.

The Purewell scored 4.41/5.00 in our lab testing, meaning it did pretty well. However, that score was calculated based our recommendation to skip the optional fluoride filters, which didn’t work at all in our tests (learn more below).

When we compared an unfiltered and a filtered tap water sample, the Purewell removed nearly all unwanted contaminants to below the minimum detection level, except:

  • Barium was removed by 75%, which is still a considerable amount.
  • Lithium was 0% removed. Now to be fair, lithium was at the lowest possible concentration pre-filtration, and maybe we would have seen at least some reduction if levels had been a little higher.
  • Strontium was 61% removed, which is pretty good.
  • Fluoride wasn’t reduced at all, even though we used the optional fluoride filters. In fact, it actually increased by 47%, presumably due to natural fluctuations.
  • Manganese increased from none detected in the unfiltered water to 0.01 ppm in our filtered sample. However, that’s also the minimum that the lab can detect, so that could simply be a coincidence, and it’s still lower than the CDC’s health guideline which we consider to be the most reasonable.
  • Some form of aluminum increased from undetected in the unfiltered water to 0.19 ppm, presumably due to leaching from the optional fluoride filters (they’re made with activated alumina, a form of aluminum oxide). And because said filters failed to remove any fluoride, we recommend you just skip them.
Lab Results Chart
Potentially Harmful Aesthetic Issues Feed Water Level Filtered Water Level Reduction Rate
Water Disinfectants
Chlorine (mg/L) 0.96 0 100%
Disinfection Byproducts
Bromodichloromethane (µg/l) 2.68 0 100%
Bromoform (µg/l) 3.19 0 100%
Dibromochloromethane (µg/l) 5.27 0 100%
Chloroform (µg/l) 1.07 0 100%
Metals
Copper (mg/L) 0.06 0 100%
Barium (mg/L) 0.04 0.01 75%
Boron (mg/L) 0.06 0 100%
Lithium (mg/L) 0.01 0.01 0%
Strontium (mg/L) 0.46 0.18 61%
Salts
Nitrate (N) (mg/L) 1.72 0 100%
Fluoride (mg/L) 0.3 0.44 47% Increase
Other
Uranium (µg/L) 1 0 100%
Impurities NOT Detected in Unfiltered Tap Water Sample
Aluminum (mg/L) 0 0.19
Manganese (mg/L) 0 0.01
Explanation:
Full Removal
Considerable Reduction
Concentration More Than Double of Unfiltered Water Sample
Potential Leaching Reached or Exceeded the Strictest Public Health Guideline We Could Find

*100% means reduction to below the minimum detection level. To learn more about our testing procedures check our editorial guidelines.

Link to Filtered Water Report
Link to Unfiltered Water Report

2. NSF Certifications and Other Test Data

While Purewell advertises certification for NSF standards 42 and 372 (these test for aesthetic effects and lead), this is for material safety only. In other words, they have no NSF certifications to demonstrate the actual performance of their filters for contaminant reduction. The same applies to almost all of Purewell’s other test data, except:

  • The company tested contaminant reduction with their Black Filters on a single sample of less than one gallon (3L). That test was only for chlorine, mercury, and lead, so we have no way to confirm the 3,000-gallon lifespan per filter they claim.
  • They tested 99.99% E. coli reduction in non-potable water. But if you’re dealing with non-potable water, we’d definitely recommend boiling as the go-to treatment method, followed by disinfection as a second choice. After boiling or disinfecting, you could still run the water through the Purewell to remove other contaminants.
  • Finally, Purewell also tested fluoride reduction using their optional fluoride filters. While their lab results showed the filters performed considerably better than they did in our lab test (86.9% removal compared to our 47% increase), they only tested to 26.4 gallons (100 liters).

3. Filtration Process

Purewell’s Black Filters combine a silver-infused activated carbon block with a .01-micron hollow fiber ultrafiltration membrane.

  • The activated carbon uses adsorption to remove bad taste and odor, and impurities and contaminants like chlorine/chloramines, DBPs and other VOCs, pesticides, pharmaceuticals, and even some heavy metals such as lead and mercury.
  • Silver acts as an antimicrobial.
  • The ultrafiltration membrane acts as a physical barrier to bacteria and other pathogens, and other floating contaminants that cannot pass through the small pore size.
Purewell (Black Filters Installed)
Purewell (Black Filters Installed)

The optional fluoride filters which attach to the bottom of the Black Filters use activated alumina that generally targets fluoride and arsenic.

Purewell (Fluoride Filters Installed)
Purewell (Fluoride Filters Installed)

4. Taste and Odor Test

In our taste and odor test, the flavor of the filtered water was spot on – no taste or odors were detected.

Usability: 4.00/5.00

The Purewell gravity water filter was very easy to set up, use (also thanks to tank stand and water level window on lower tank), and maintain. The initial filter priming was slow, but based on our speed test, although you can’t filter on demand, the 2.25-gallon storage capacity should supply enough drinking water if you plan ahead.

1. Initial Setup

The initial setup was slow because the initial priming of the filters was quite slow, but that is pretty common for gravity water filters. The system assembly itself is fast and easy, with no additional tools required.

Here is an overview of the setup process:

  1. Wash the chambers, lid, and spigot.
  2. Insert the lid screw from the inside and screw the knob to the outside of the lid.
  3. Metal and silicone gaskets are attached to the spigot before being inserted into the hole.
  4. Additional metal and silicone gaskets are added to the inside before attaching the nut by hand.
  5. Unscrew the nut and silicone gaskets from the filter and rinse the filter surface.
  6. Prime the filter by placing the nut on upside down, then placing a silicone gasket on top. Hold that gasket tightly against the water tap and turn it on, allowing the water to push through.
  7. Place a silicone gasket on the filter stem and insert it through the hole in the top chamber.
  8. Place the other silicone gasket on and use the nut to screw it tightly in place.
  9. Repeat with the second filter.
  10. Place the bottom chamber on the anti-slip ring and place it on the stand.
  11. Place the upper container on top and add the lid.
Purewell (System Assembly)
Purewell (System Assembly)

2. Everyday Use

Once primed and set up, the Purewell is easy and straightforward to use. Simply fill the upper chamber with water and wait for it to filter. Unfortunately, the filtration process is slow, and there’s no way to speed it up. But, one thing we really liked was how the stand lets you slide the system back on your counter while still having room to fit a glass underneath. This allows you to place the Purewell almost anywhere and makes dispensing easy.

We also liked how the built-in window on the lower tank lets you check the water level at a glance without lifting the top chamber. That’s especially helpful since these types of gravity filters keep working even when the bottom chamber is full, and adding more water at that point can cause leaking.

The Purewell is also very portable thanks to its sturdy design, ease of disassembling, light weight (9 lbs with filters installed), and ability to transport it with the upper tank stored in the lower tank for compactness.

3. Filtration/Dispensing Speed Test

In our speed test, we added 2 gallons to the tank, used 2 Black + fluoride filters in parallel, and dispensed 4 cups of water after 1:01 hours. While that doesn’t sound great, it’s actually quite decent for a gravity-type filter. Unlike with other systems, however, you can only use a maximum of two filter elements, so you cannot add more filters to speed up the filtration process. This means you cannot filter on demand. But fortunately, the 2.25-gallon capacity means you should have enough water if you plan ahead.

Purewell (Dispensing Water)
Purewell (Dispensing Water)

4. Maintenance (Filter Replacements)

Maintenance was also very easy and straightforward. Simply unscrew the nuts on the filters and replace them with two new primed filters.

While the manufacturer recommends replacing your filters every 12 months or 6,000 gallons for the pair (3,000 gallons per filter), this is neither NSF-certified nor even tested by the manufacturer to back up their filter life claims. So we recommend replacing them after about 500 gallons or every 6 months to ensure safe drinking water. We base that on the amount of filter media you get compared to similar filters that were tested for their entire lifespan. The optional fluoride filters are rated to a more realistic 500 gallons per filter.

Another thing to note is that there is no filter life indicator, so you must keep track of how many gallons you consume to determine the right time for replacement.

Purewell (Priming Black Filters)
Purewell (Priming Black Filters)

Costs: 4.94/5.00

1. Upfront Price

As of January 2025, the Purewell system costs $159 with two Black Filters and one tank stand, making it our favorite budget pick gravity filter.

2. Long-Term Expenses for Filter Replacements

Based on our adjusted filter life of 500 gallons or every 6 months, your yearly costs will be about $140 so also pretty cheap!

If you use the optional two fluoride filters in parallel (which we recommend you skip), it will cost another ~$50-$70 per year.

Additional Ranking Factors

1. Durable Materials

The Purewell is similar to other countertop gravity water filters in that it is made with 304 stainless steel tanks. However, the Purewell goes one step further and uses a metal spigot rather than plastic. That rates it very well for durable materials, especially considering it’s such a budget model.

Purewell (Metal Spigot)
Purewell (Metal Spigot)

2. Questionable Customer Service

Unfortunately, customer service seems questionable, but given the price, you know the saying: you get what you pay for. The company website is poorly made with confusing and inconsistent language. To make matters worse, they offer a very vague warranty and a return policy of only 30 days “with reasonable reason”. If you just decide you don’t like it or want a different size or color, you must return it within 7 days, paying the express cost for returning it yourself. Overall, their site and poor return policies do not convey much trust.

3. Frequent Customer Complaints

Some third-party customers have complained about taste issues and clogged filters. This may be why there’re washing instructions on the Purewell site to clean the filters if you have issues “when no water go through filters”. Other customers have complained of leaking.

Bottom Line: Best Budget Pick for Gravity-Type Countertop Filter

We gave the Purewell an overall rating of 3.83/5.00. It’s a decent option if you insist on a home gravity-type countertop water filter and you don’t want to spring for the Big Berkey. The Purewell didn’t perform as well in this category as the Big Berkey did, but the system is much more budget-friendly. There are also restocking issues with the Big Berkey filters, so from that perspective, the Purewell might be the better choice right now.

In our lab tests, the system did a pretty good job in its filtration results, especially for nitrate. Taste and odor of the water were flawless. The lack of NSF certification for contaminant reduction and the minimal contaminant reduction testing the company performed means we have no way to confirm their 3,000-gallon per filter lifespan. On the plus side, the Purewell is very easy to set up, use (also thanks to its tank stand and water level window on lower tank), and maintain.

About the Author(s)

Sara

Sara has been a lifelong home-improvement fan (she’s been hooked on This Old House since she was five) and taught herself any project she didn’t already know by watching YouTube tutorials. She is also an award-winning filmmaker. Armed with this skillset, Sara installs, primes, samples, uses, and maintains nearly every point-of-use water treatment systems we test – then brings her results to life on camera for our YouTube channel.

Raoul

Raoul has a background in mechanical engineering and has been writing about home water treatment since 2015. He designs our product review processes, analyzes the results, and ties everything together. As editor-in-chief, he tries hard to keep the whole operation running smoothly behind the scenes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top