This page contains affiliate links. Learn more.
Our Verdict (Best For)
The Bluevua ROPOT-Lite achieved solid to excellent results in our 2024/2025 lab tests and delivered clean-tasting water (+ nice mineral taste with the mineral cartridge). However, it has only 4 NSF/ANSI certifications for contaminant reduction, and at least some of its limited 3rd-party testing was not done to full filter life. Plus, it showed evidence of potential methylene chloride leaching both test years. Easy to use and maintain, it monitors filtered water TDS and has filter replacement/water shortage indicators. It’s fast enough, filling its carafe (pours smoothly and fits fridges) with ~5.5 cups in a few mins with one button push, which you can store for later. Wastewater is low, despite auto-flushing which counters TDS creep. With its small size and average upfront and ongoing costs, it’s a solid countertop RO, but we think there are better options out there.
The Bluevua RO100ROPOT-Lite (aka Bluevua ROPOT-Lite) is a countertop reverse osmosis system that doesn’t require a plumbing connection. It’s designed for use as a drinking water filter and can purify both tap water and properly disinfected well water (pre-treatment may be required).
As usual, we’ve tested the system with our own hands:
- Hands-on experience: We assembled, primed, used, and maintained it.
- Filtration effectiveness: Across 2 independent test rounds, we sent unfiltered and filtered tap water samples to professional laboratories for analysis to determine real-world contaminant reduction. Each round used a different filter set, water supply, and lab. We also reviewed NSF/ANSI certifications and other available test data.
- More testing: We conducted taste and odor evaluations as well as filtration speed, maximum continuous dispensing, and wastewater tests.
- All other product aspects: We considered initial and long-term costs, warranties, additional features, frequent customer complaints, and more.
To learn more about our testing procedure check our editorial guidelines.
Contents
Final Rating: /5.00
FiltrationFiltration score combines our lab results and taste testing with NSF/ANSI certifications and 3rd-party contaminant reduction data.: /5.00
Usability: /5.00
CostsCost scores reflect overall value for money rather than price alone.: /5.00
| Type: | Countertop Reverse Osmosis System |
| PriceNo short-term sales. (Nov 4, 2025): | $299 |
| Yearly CostEstimate is based on rated/claimed filter life and 500 gallons annual water consumption. No short-term sales. (Nov 4, 2025): | ~$80 (Excl. ~$34 for Optional Remineralization Post-Filter) |
Final Rating: /5.00
What We Like Most
- Solid results in our 2024 lab testing and excellent results in 2025.
- Clean taste with no odor in 2024 and 2025; optional remineralization post-filter adds minerals and a pleasant mineral note.
- Simple, modern design that feels sturdy and well built, including the glass carafe.
- Small footprint saves counter space; lightweight for portability.
- Easy setup and priming with clear illustrated instructions and a helpful YouTube tutorial.
- Suited for daily use; small carafe stores water for later, making it instantly accessible.
- Single feed tank can produce two full carafes (~42 oz each) with two button presses; can fill a 40-oz bottle with one carafe or dispense directly into a glass.
- Responsive touchscreen with two presets: full (~0.32 gal) or half (~0.17 gal); customizable up to ~0.32 gal.
- Feed tank is easy to refill – water shortage/change indicator alerts you.
- Carafe has volume and time markers; easy handling without splashing; fridge-friendly.
- TDS monitoring of filtered water.
- Automatic + manual flushing to counter TDS creep and extend RO membrane life.
- Low to very low wastewater for a countertop RO.
- Easy filter changes via top panel; quick twist in/out; filter change indicators and included filter wrench.
What We Don’t Like
- Considerable amount of methylene chloride detected in filtered water in our 2024 and 2025 lab testing (below the strictest health guidelines).
- Only 4 NSF/ANSI certifications (TDS, chromium 3, cadmium, lead) and limited third-party testing, with some not covering the full filter life.
- Very slow dispensing into a glass.
- Flushing wastes water.
- Third-party complaints report leaking, malfunctioning units, and underreported filtered-water TDS suggesting better performance.
How the Bluevua RO100ROPOT-Lite Compares to…
17 Other Countertop Reverse Osmosis Systems
In this video, Sara explains why the Bluevua ROPOT-Lite did not become one of our top picks among the 18 countertop RO systems we tested..
Please note: Our full guide on the best countertop reverse osmosis systems is available here.
Video Chapters + Comparison Sheet
- Link to Comparison Sheet
- 00:00 – Intro
- 00:49 – What’s New
- 01:40 – Our 18 RO Systems
- 04:47 – AquaTru Classic (Pt. 1) + How We Tested
- 13:06 – AquaTru Classic (Pt. 2) + 3 System Types
- 18:05 – AquaTru Classic (Pt. 3)
- 26:19 – AquaTru Carafe + Bluevua ROPOT
- 39:34 – Hot Water: Waterdrop C1H
- 46:16 – Hot & Cold Water: Waterdrop A1
- 53:16 – Remaining Systems (Quick-Fire Round)
- 59:09 – Summary
Full Analysis of the Bluevua RO100ROPOT-Lite
Filtration: /5.00
The Bluevua ROPOT-Lite countertop RO system scored 4.39/5.00 for filtration. How? Most importantly, it achieved solid to excellent results in our 2024 and 2025 lab testing and the filtered water had a clean taste (pleasant mineral taste when using the optional mineral cartridge) and no odor. However, the system has limited 3rd party testing for contaminant reduction (with at least some not performed over the full filter life) and only 4 NSF/ANSI-certified contaminants.
1. Lab Results: /5.00 (2025) & /5.00 (2024)
Remember that our before vs after lab comparison is not an exact science. It’s informational and subject to variability, inaccuracies, and interferences caused by natural fluctuations in water quality, accidental contamination, human error, instrumentation issues, and more. Furthermore, our lab-testing is limited to those contaminants present in our water supplies and at their respective concentrations. As such, it can only give us a general idea for how effective a certain water treatment product might be.
In our 2024 and 2025 lab tests comparing an unfiltered and a filtered tap water sample, the Bluevua ROPOT-Lite could remove 13 undesirable impurities and contaminants to below the minimum detection level (so essentially to 100%): chlorine, bromodichloromethane, bromoform, dibromochloromethane, chloroform, copper, barium, lithium, iron, manganese, zinc, nitrate, and uranium.
The following substances remained in our water:
- Boron was reduced by a solid 67% in 2024 and comparable 66% in 2025.
- Strontium was reduced by a very high 97% in 2024 and was completely removed in 2025.
- Fluoride was reduced by a minimum of 86% (high) and up to 99% (very high) in 2024. This range indicates some fluoride remained in the water but it was so little that the lab couldn’t quantify precisely how much was left. In our 2025 lab test, we used a different and more precise fluoride detection method and fluoride was completely eliminated.
Finally, TDS decreased by 94% in 2024 and by 98% in 2025. While TDS should not be interpreted independently, as it does not override inadequate removal of individual contaminants, ≥90% TDS reduction is high (>95% is very high) and shows that the RO membrane works as intended.
Aside from contaminant reduction, we found methylene chloride in our 2024 and 2025 filtered water that was not present in the unfiltered water, suggesting potential leaching. At concentrations of 2.41 ppb and 1.24 ppb, respectively, this is still below the strictest health guideline we could find of 4 ppb per the OEHHA. That said, these levels are only ~1.7-3.2x lower than the guideline, so we feel this amount of methylene chloride is somewhat concerning.
Lab Results Charts
| Potentially Harmful | Aesthetic Issues | Feed Water Level | Filtered Water Level | Reduction Rate | |
| Water Disinfectants | |||||
| Chlorine (mg/L) | ✖ | ✖ | ~2 | 0 | 100% |
| Disinfection Byproducts | |||||
| Bromodichloromethane (µg/L) | ✖ | 17.5 | 0 | 100% | |
| Dibromochloromethane (µg/L) | ✖ | 4.36 | 0 | 100% | |
| Chloroform (µg/L) | ✖ | 39.6 | 0 | 100% | |
| Metals | |||||
| Copper (mg/L) | ✖ | ✖ | 0.009 | 0 | 100% |
| Iron (mg/L) | ✖ | 0.0882 | 0 | 100% | |
| Manganese (mg/L) | ✖ | ✖ | 0.0055 | 0 | 100% |
| Barium (mg/L) | ✖ | 0.0354 | 0 | 100% | |
| Boron (mg/L) | ✖ | 0.112 | 0.0377 | 66% | |
| Strontium (mg/L) | ✖ | 0.11 | 0 | 100% | |
| Salts | |||||
| Nitrate (N) (mg/L) | ✖ | 3.17 | 0 | 100% | |
| Fluoride (mg/L) | ✖ | 1.04 | 0 | 100% | |
| RO Salt Rejection | |||||
| TDS (mg/L) | ✖ | 466 | 11.1 | 98% | |
| Other Parameters | |||||
| pH | 7.6 | 6.3 | |||
| Impurities NOT Detected in Unfiltered Tap Water Sample | |||||
| Methylene Chloride (µg/L) | ✖ | 0 | 1.24 | ||
| Lab Reports: Filtered Water Report, Unfiltered Water Report | |||||
| Chlorine Self Test Photos: Filtered Water, Unfiltered Water | |||||
| Explanation: | |||||
| Full Removal | |||||
| Considerable Reduction | |||||
| Concentration More Than Double of Unfiltered Water Sample | |||||
| Potential Leaching Reached or Exceeded the Strictest Public Health Guideline We Could Find | |||||
| Potentially Harmful | Aesthetic Issues | Feed Water Level | Filtered Water Level | Reduction Rate | |
| Water Disinfectants | |||||
| Chlorine (mg/L) | ✖ | ✖ | 1.39 | 0 | 100% |
| Disinfection Byproducts | |||||
| Bromodichloromethane (µg/L) | ✖ | 4.04 | 0 | 100% | |
| Bromoform (µg/L) | ✖ | 2.95 | 0 | 100% | |
| Dibromochloromethane (µg/L) | ✖ | 5.95 | 0 | 100% | |
| Chloroform (µg/L) | ✖ | 2.19 | 0 | 100% | |
| Metals | |||||
| Copper (mg/L) | ✖ | ✖ | 0.06 | 0 | 100% |
| Barium (mg/L) | ✖ | 0.04 | 0 | 100% | |
| Boron (mg/L) | ✖ | 0.06 | 0.02 | 67% | |
| Zinc (mg/L) | ✖ | 0.01 | 0 | 100% | |
| Lithium (mg/L) | ✖ | 0.01 | 0 | 100% | |
| Strontium (mg/L) | ✖ | 0.38 | 0.01 | 97% | |
| Salts | |||||
| Nitrate (N) (mg/L) | ✖ | 1.21 | 0 | 100% | |
| Fluoride (mg/L) | ✖ | 0.69 | <0.1 | Anywhere Between 86% and 99% | |
| Other | |||||
| Uranium (µg/L) | ✖ | 1 | 0 | 100% | |
| RO Salt Rejection | |||||
| TDS (mg/L) | ✖ | 327 | 20.4 | 94% | |
| Other Parameters | |||||
| pH | 7.78 | 6.45 | |||
| Impurities NOT Detected in Unfiltered Tap Water Sample | |||||
| Methylene Chloride (µg/L) | ✖ | 0 | 2.41 | ||
| Lab Reports: Filtered Water Report, Unfiltered Water Report | |||||
| Explanation: | |||||
| Full Removal | |||||
| Considerable Reduction | |||||
| Concentration More Than Double of Unfiltered Water Sample | |||||
| Potential Leaching Reached or Exceeded the Strictest Public Health Guideline We Could Find | |||||
2. NSF/ANSI Certifications and Other Test Data
The Bluevua ROPOT-Lite has 4 NSF/ANSI certifications for contaminant reduction against NSF/ANSI standard 58 for TDS, chromium 3, cadmium, and lead.
It also has 3rd party testing for a handful of contaminants but it doesn’t reference NSF/ANSI standards for several; plus, some of this testing appears to have been performed at the start of the filter life rather than throughout the entire filter life.
Reported reduction rates include:
- TDS (96.20%)
- Chromium 3 (99.80%)
- Cadmium (96.80%)
- PFOA (>97.36%)
- PFOS (>99.25%)
- coli bacteriophage MS2 (surrogate test for human enteric viruses; >99.99%)
- Total coliforms (>99.99%)
- Fluoride (>99.84%)
- Arsenic (>98.53%)
- Lead (>99.97%)
- Dissociate chlorine residue (>99.90%)
Reduction rates are per Bluevua’s test reports.
3. Filtration Process
We have 1 filter cartridge which comprises 5 filtration stages, plus an optional remineralization cartridge.
- Stage 1 is a 5-micron PP sediment pre-filter layer (mechanical filtration) which acts like a sieve to remove solid, undissolved particulates such as dirt or rust.
- Stage 2 is a 0.5-micron coconut shell activated carbon block. Activated carbon removes things like bad tastes and odors, chlorine/chloramine, disinfection byproducts and other organics, as well as certain metals. In addition, the block structure provides fine mechanical filtration due to its smaller pore size compared to granular carbon. By removing chlorine and other contaminants, this pre-filter protects the RO membrane from damage.
- Stage 3 is a 1-micron PP sediment pre-filter layer with a finer pore size than in stage 1, removing even smaller particles to further prolong the RO membrane’s lifespan.
- Stage 4 is performed by the RO membrane, which uses reverse osmosis to effectively remove the vast majority of contaminants and minerals.
- Stage 5 is a 0.1-micron coconut shell carbon block, which acts as a “polishing” filter to remove lingering bad tastes/odors, VOCs, and fine particulate matter.
- Optional: the remineralization post-filter is a separate, second filter element that restores minerals like calcium, sodium, magnesium, potassium, and zinc, raises the pH to prevent acidity, and boosts the water’s flavor.
4. Taste and Odor Tests
In our 2024 and 2025 tests, the filtered water was odorless and had a perfectly clean taste. The optional remineralization filter added a nice, light mineral taste.
Usability: /5.00
The Bluevua RO100ROPOT-Lite achieved a usability score of 4.60/5.00, based on its performance in the following categories:
- Initial system assembly including filter priming (0.80/0.80)
- Everyday use (3.30/3.70)
- Filter replacements (0.50/0.50)
1. Initial Setup: /0.80
Assembling the Bluevua Lite is easy. In addition to clear, illustrated directions in the user manual, there is a QR-code linked tutorial video on YouTube.
Here’s a quick breakdown of the setup procedure:
- Wash the feed tank and carafe.
- Plug the power cord into a power outlet.
- Fill the feed tank with tap water up to the MAX fill line. Install feed tank and carafe into the unit. Do not put the optional infuser basket in, as the filter has not been flushed yet.
- Touch the “Flush” button to automatically flush water through the system.
- When filtering is complete, discard the wastewater remaining in the feed tank and the water in the carafe.
- Repeat steps 3 through 5 four times to flush out the protective liquid in the filters before drinking. The water is NOT drinkable during the flushing process.
- During the first 1-2 filtration cycles, the water in the feed tank will automatically fill the filters, and there may be no clean water produced. For cycles 3-4, it is normal for the filtered water to appear black or grey due to the activated carbon particles released by flushing the filters.
- Now your system is ready to use.
2. Day-to-Day Use: /3.70
2.1 Speed & Water Capacity: /1.40
The ROPOT-Lite is well-suited for daily use – Bluevua recommends it especially for 1-2 person households. Firstly, its carafe, though quite small, stores water for later – up to ~5.8 cups (~0.36 gal). Consequently, you can fill a 40-oz bottle on a single refill all in one pour – no need to refill the feed tank in between or wait for additional cycles of water processing. And while you can’t fit a standard 2-quart carafe under the spout, as its height is only 9.5” from the base, you could still dispense 2 quarts without refilling the feed tank, assuming you found a carafe that would fit – it would just require two button pushes.
More specifically and based on a single full feed tank (0.97 gal), in our test the system could dispense 42.5 oz (one full carafe) of ambient water in one button push; after a ten second pause, a second button push yielded another 43 oz. Rounding up, we estimate 3 daily refills for the average US and US-family households, respectively – about average for a countertop RO.
In addition, the ROPOT-Lite filters fast enough to meet the daily water needs of the average-sized US households, and it can handle thirst bursts. In our ambient water speed tests, it could dispense 1 or 4 cups instantly when the water was pre-processed, meaning the feed tank was filled and allowed to fully filter all its water first. This is because we are pouring directly from a full carafe – no wait time for water processing needed. However, if dispensing directly into a glass, it is very slow – it took 44.0-55.5 sec for 1 cup in our test. Upon refilling the tank, it took 4:01 min to dispense 4 cups of water.
2.2 Dispensing: /1.00
Dispensing water is simple using the Bluevua’s responsive and easy-to-navigate touch screen. You may choose to dispense into the provided carafe or straight into a glass, which it does without splashing. However, depending on the size of your glass or bottle, you may have to hold it at an angle for it to fit.
It also has two volume presets for a full carafe (~0.32 gal) or half carafe (~0.17 gal). You can dispense a custom volume (up to ~0.32 gal max) by selecting the full carafe volume preset and stopping filtration early by tapping the “water-making” button.
The carafe has a comfortable handle, slides in and out of the base easily, and provides a smooth stream without splashing, even when pouring fast.
If you use the optional mineral cartridge, it is placed inside the carafe lid. Filtered water passes through the cartridge as it is dispensed into the carafe. After dispensing, the water remains in contact with the minerals as long as the carafe is full and the cartridge stays submerged. The result: water from a full carafe that sits for longer periods before pouring can have a higher mineral content.
2.3 Refilling & Size: /0.70
Refilling the Bluevua Lite is straightforward. The feed water tank sits in the back of the unit but is still easy to remove, refill, and place back on its base.
It’s simple to keep track of when it’s time to empty the wastewater and refill the feed tank, too, as the system has a water shortage/change indicator light on the LED display.
Measuring 9.5″x13.8″x9.5″ (WxHxD), the ROPOT-Lite fits under standard height (18”) kitchen cabinets, and at 15.8 lb, it’s lighter than the average countertop ROs we tested. Its smaller-than-average footprint compared to the other tested systems saves space on your counter, occupying only 90.25 in2 (~0.63 ft2), but at almost 10” wide it is not streamlined enough to fit in narrow spots.
2.3 Other: /0.60
The carafe fits in the fridge for chilling and has both time and volume markers to help you meet your hydration goals.
The system also offers automatic TDS monitoring of the filtered water, which provides insight into the current state of your RO membrane and can be used along with the filter replacement indicators to determine the ideal time to change your filters. In our testing, we found the measurements to be consistently within 15-20 ppb using a separate meter so reasonably accurate.
3. Filter Replacements: /0.50
Filter replacements are easy as there’s only one filter to replace (not counting the optional remineralization cartridge) that’s easily accessible through the system’s top lid and quickly twists in/out. A filter wrench is included if you need help removing.
The filter change indicator light on the control panel alerts you when it is time to change. Rated filter life for the cartridge is 1,056 gal or 12 months. (The optional remineralization post-filter lasts 260 gal or 6 months.)
Assuming 500 gallons of yearly water consumption for the average household, we predict the frequency of your filter changes will be dictated by filter age rather than water consumption. Therefore, expect to replace every 12 months as indicated (every 6 months for the mineral cartridge).
1,056 gal or 12 months filter life may be unrealistic, though (more info below). Using a lifespan of up to 6 months, filter replacement frequency would increase to 2x annually.
Support BOS Water’s Mission!
Every coffee helps us test more products and bring you unbiased results!
Costs: /5.00
Based on value for money, the Bluevua RO100ROPOT-Lite achieved a cost score of 4.04 out of 5.00, indicating it is priced about average for what it offers compared to competing systems (a score of 4.00 represents average value). Notably, both its upfront price and annual filter replacement costs are around average for the countertop RO systems we tested.
1. Upfront Price
As of November 4, 2025, the Bluevua Lite is priced at $299. This is around the $321.89 average across all the countertop RO systems we tested.
2. Long-Term Expenses for Filter Replacements
Based on 500 gallons consumption and a 1,056-gal or 12-month filter life (main filter), we estimate $80 in annual filter replacement costs, which is well below the $149.47 average across all the countertop ROs tested.
However, given the lack of long-term contaminant testing and minimal NSF certifications, replacing filters twice yearly might be a safer choice, which would bring annual filter costs to an about-average $160 per year.
If you choose to purchase the optional remineralization filter, that will add another $34 yearly based on its 260-gal or 6-month filter life.
3. Product Warranty
The system is covered by a 1-year warranty.
4. Other Cost Factors
- The carafe is made from borosilicate glass.
- Built-in TDS meter provides measurements of the filtered water.
- Borosilicate glass fruit infuser is included to make flavored water.
Additional
1. Pure-to-Drain Ratio Tests
We measured a pure-to-drain ratio of ~1:0.38 (2024) and ~1:0.41 (2025), which is low to very low wastewater for RO systems in general and better than the average ~1:0.61 across the countertop RO systems we tested.
2. Construction
The system feels sturdy and well built, including the glass carafe.
3. Design
The ROPOT-Lite has a simple, yet modern appearance. In addition, there are two appealing colors to choose from.
4. Simple Maintenance
This system performs automatic backflushing for 30 seconds during the following: when the unit is powered on, when a new feed water tank is placed on the base, after every filtration cycle, and after it has not been used for over 24 hours. This counters TDS creep and extends RO membrane life.
You can also manually flush the system at any time for 30 seconds with the manual flush option. This is helpful if you want to completely empty the internal clean water tank, or if you want to flush the system after not having used it for a while. However, flushing produces wastewater.
5. Small Extras
The borosilicate glass fruit infuser basket is a nice-add on, but it leaves less room for water and can’t be used together with the remineralization filter. Also, you have to be careful not to add too much fruit or the carafe will overflow – we had to manually stop the dispense in our test to avoid spilling.
The printed recipe book is also a welcome addition.
6. Frequent Customer Complaints
We read about issues with leaking and malfunctioning units. Other customers complained that the system underreported filtered water TDS to suggest better performance.
We did not experience most of these issues firsthand, though we did observe a minor amount of TDS creep with our unit. In general, we found the system’s TDS readings to be fairly accurate.
Side note: It’s also possible that the higher TDS readings could be due to use of the optional mineral cartridge.
Bottom Line: Solid Compact Countertop RO System with Glass Carafe (/5.00)
Filtration weighted at 60%, and usability and cost at 20% each, the Bluevua ROPOT-Lite scored a final rating of 4.36 out of 5.00.
There’s a lot we like about the system. It balances effective filtration with reasonable costs and user-friendly features, all in a small footprint with a sturdy glass carafe.
Importantly, the system achieved a solid 4.39/5.00 in our filtration analysis. It produced odorless, clean-tasting water and completely removed most contaminants in our 2024 and 2025 lab tests. However, it only has 4 NSF/ANSI certifications for contaminant reduction, with limited 3rd party testing that may not have been to NSF/ANSI standards and at least some not done to the full filter life. In addition, it showed evidence of potential leaching of methylene chloride both years, albeit below the strictest health guideline.
On the plus side, the Bluevua ROPOT-Lite is very easy to setup, use, and maintain, filters enough water for average-sized households and has useful features like filtered water TDS monitoring, water shortage/filter replacement indicators, automatic flushing, and optional remineralization
Bottom line: Solid, but we think there are better options out there.
Further Reading
